Literature and links

Literature

Coenen M et al.: Bewertung der methodischen Qualitat von systematischen Ubersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews). [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)]. Rofo. 2013 Sep;184(10):937-40. PubMed PMID: 23999778

 

Kung J et al.: From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dent J. 2010 Jul 16;4:84-91. PubMed PMID: 21088686

 

Levac D et al.: Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. PubMed PMID: 20854677

 

Liberati et al.: The PRISMA Statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009, 6(7): e1000100. PubMed PMID: 19622552

 

Mattioli et al.: Search strings for study of putative occupational determinants of disease. Occup Environ Med 2010 July; 67(7): 436–443. PubMed PMID: 19819858

 

Moher D et al., PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. Pub-Med PMID: 19622551

 

Schaafsma F. et al.: Developing search strategies in Medline on the occupational origin of dis-eases. Am J. Ind. Med. 2006; 49:127-137. PubMed PMID: 16362948

 

Shea BJ et al.: AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009, 62(10):1013-1020. PubMed PMID: 19230606

 

Verbeek J et al.: Synthesizing study results in a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 May;38(3):282-90. PubMed PMID: 22015561

 

Verbeek J et al.: A search strategy for occupational health intervention studies. Occup Environment Med 2005; 62: 682-687. PubMed PMID: 16169913

 

Wilczynski NL et al.: EMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):29-33. PubMed PMID: 17161751

 

Ziegler A et al.: Bevorzugte Report Items für systematische Übersichten und Meta-Analysen: Das PRISMA-Statement. Preferred reporting items of systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011;136:e9-e15

(German translation of Moher 2009)

 

Links

 

Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group: http://osh.cochrane.org/

 

The Cochrane Collaboration: Reporting Guidelines: http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/evidence-based-health-care/webliography/books/reporting

 

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination in York: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/

 

PRISMA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses http://www.prisma-statement.org

 

SIGN: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. www.sign.ac.uk

 

Back to top